Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease

In the first quarter, sales of the top three products Amgen gained from its $27.8 billion acquisition of Horizon Therapeutics fell far short of analyst expectations, with each seeing a double-digit sequential sales decline. It’s been 19 months since Amgen completed its $27.8 billion acquisition of Horizon Therapeutics, and the California company is still struggling to build momentum for three of the prized possessions of the deal—rare disease drugs Uplizna, Krystexxa and Tepezza.When Amgen presented its first-quarter earnings Thursday, none of the trio met analyst expectations. With sales of $91 million, Uplizna came up $20 million short of the consensus projection. Meanwhile, Krystexxa’s haul of $236 million was $57 million shy of expectations, and Tepezza’s $381 million figure was $69 million off the mark.The shortfall for the Horizon products came during a quarter in which most of the company’s other treatments exceeded expectations. In fact, Amgen’s overall revenue of $8.1 billion was a 9% increase year over year and topped the analyst consensus. The lack of success for the Horizon drugs is apparently becoming a sore subject for Amgen execs. During a conference call, after an analyst asked about the stagnant sales of Tepezza and referred to a “couple years” since the Horizon buyout, Chief Financial Officer Peter Griffith was quick to make a correction.“Just a reminder that the transaction closed in October of 2023,” Griffith said. “It’s been about a year and a half, although so much has happened in the world it might feel like more than that.”The most vexing Horizon product has been with Tepezza, which remains the lone drug on the market for thyroid eye disease. In its second full year on the market under Horizon, in 2022, it generated $1.96 billion in revenue. But, in the following year, sales came in at $1.77 billion, followed by $1.85 billion last year, when there were signs that Tepezza was rallying.But the $381 million quarterly result for the treatment was a stunner—it’s lowest figure for a three-month period since the first quarter of 2021 and a 17% sequential decline.“Sales of Tepezza and Krystexxa were adversely impacted in the quarter by changes to U.S. wholesaler inventory levels," Amgen’s chief commercial officer Murdo Gordon explained. "We do not expect similar deductions in inventory levels for the remainder of the year."But the result sounded an alarm bell with Mizuho Securities analyst Salim Syed, who noted the 9% decline in volume and 8% decrease in inventory levels, which “likely put the Horizon acquisition into even more question,” he wrote in a note to investors.Gordon explained that the initial uptake of Tepezza was strong as it was a long-awaited answer for people who had serious cases of the eye disease and were readily prescribed the treatment from plastic surgeons. To grow sales, Tepezza needs to secure more prescriptions from general ophthalmologist and endocrinologists, he added.But tapping this segment of the market “may be more challenging to penetrate than previously communicated by the company,” analysts from Citi wrote in a note to clients.Amgen is far from abandoning hope for Tepezza. The company recently gained a thumbs-up from Europe’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use nd is ready to launch there upon an expected approval. An additional edge Amgen could secure to help spur sales would be to earn approval for a subcutaneous version of Tepezza, as opposed to the 60- to 90-minute infusions patients undergo every three weeks as it stands. A subQ option would allow patients to receive the treatment faster and in many more settings than at infusion centers. Testing on the formulation began last year.On a much smaller scale, sales also were disappointing for Uplizna, which fell sequentially from $101 million in the fourth quarter to $91 million in the first.But help has already arrived in the form of a label expansion last month, making Uplizna the first drug to win an FDA approval for immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD), a disease that affects 20,000 patients in the U.S. and has no standard of care. Additionally, Amgen announced Thursday that it has secured an FDA decision date of Dec. 14 for Uplizna to treat patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).With respect to all of the Horizon products, Amgen’s message on Thursday was to give them more time.“It’s a very young portfolio of products where we’re really just beginning to address the severe diseases that these drugs treat,” Jay Bradner, Amgen’s R&D chief, said. “Whether it’s Tepezza, Uplizna, Krystexxa or Tavneos, these are going to be key growth-driving products for us over the long haul.”   

THOUSAND OAKS, Calif., May 1, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) today announced financial results for the first quarter of 2025. "Demand for our products was strong globally in the first quarter. Ongoing new product launches and successful Phase 3 trial results for several products make us feel confident in our long-term growth prospects," said Robert A. Bradway, chairman and chief executive officer. Key results include: For the first quarter, total revenues increased 9% to $8.1 billion in comparison to the first quarter of 2024. Product sales grew 11%, primarily driven by 14% volume growth, partially offset by 6% lower net selling price. U.S. sales grew 14%. Fourteen products delivered at least double-digit sales growth in the first quarter, including Repatha® (evolocumab), BLINCYTO® (blinatumomab), TEZSPIRE® (tezepelumab-ekko), EVENITY® (romosozumab-aqqg), TAVNEOS® (avacopan) and UPLIZNA® (inebilizumab-cdon). Our launch of IMDELLTRA ® (tarlatamab-dlle) generated $81 million of sales in the quarter and the Phase 3 confirmatory study demonstrated improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy. IMDELLTRA ® launched in Japan in April 2025. GAAP earnings per share (EPS) were $3.20 for the first quarter of 2025 compared with a GAAP loss per share of $0.21 for the first quarter of 2024, resulting from an unrealized gain on our BeiGene, Ltd. equity investment during the first quarter of 2025 compared to an unrealized loss during the prior year period, partially offset by an Otezla® intangible asset impairment charge of $800 million recorded during the first quarter of 2025. GAAP operating income increased from $1.0 billion to $1.2 billion, and GAAP operating margin increased 1.1 percentage points to 15.0%. Non-GAAP EPS increased 24% from $3.96 to $4.90, driven by higher revenues, partially offset by higher operating expenses. Non-GAAP operating income increased from $3.1 billion to $3.6 billion and non-GAAP operating margin increased 2.5 percentage points to 45.7%. The Company generated $1.0 billion of free cash flow in the first quarter of 2025 versus $0.5 billion in the first quarter of 2024. This increase reflects an $800 million tax deposit made in the first quarter of 2024 and current quarter business performance, partially offset by timing of working capital items and higher capital expenditures. References in this release to "non-GAAP" measures, measures presented "on a non-GAAP basis," and "free cash flow" (computed by subtracting capital expenditures from operating cash flow) refer to non-GAAP financial measures. Adjustments to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and other items are presented in the attached reconciliations. Refer to Non-GAAP Financial Measures below for further discussion. Product Sales Performance General Medicine Repatha® (evolocumab) sales increased 27% year-over-year to $656 million in the first quarter, primarily driven by 41% volume growth, partially offset by 9% lower net selling price. EVENITY® (romosozumab-aqqg) sales increased 29% year-over-year to $442 million in the first quarter, driven by volume growth. Prolia® (denosumab) sales increased 10% year-over-year to $1.1 billion in the first quarter, primarily driven by 13% volume growth, partially offset by 5% lower net selling price. For 2025, we expect sales erosion driven by biosimilar competition, particularly in the second half of the year. Rare Disease TEPEZZA® (teprotumumab-trbw) sales decreased 10% year-over-year to $381 million in the first quarter, primarily driven by 9% lower volume and 8% from a decrease in inventory levels, partially offset by higher net selling price. KRYSTEXXA® (pegloticase) sales were flat year-over-year at $236 million in the first quarter, as 11% volume growth was offset by 10% from a decrease in inventory levels. UPLIZNA® (inebilizumab-cdon) sales increased 14% year-over-year to $91 million in the first quarter, primarily driven by volume growth. TAVNEOS® (avacopan) sales increased 76% year-over-year to $90 million in the first quarter, primarily driven by volume growth. Ultra-Rare products, which consist of RAVICTI® (glycerol phenylbutyrate), PROCYSBI® (cysteamine bitartrate), ACTIMMUNE® (interferon gamma-1b), BUPHENYL® (sodium phenylbutyrate) and QUINSAIR® (levofloxacin), generated $179 million of sales in the first quarter. Sales increased 6% year-over-year for the first quarter, driven by volume growth. Inflammation TEZSPIRE® (tezepelumab-ekko) sales increased 65% year-over-year to $285 million in the first quarter, driven by volume growth. Otezla® (apremilast) sales increased 11% year-over-year to $437 million in the first quarter, driven by 12% favorable changes to estimated sales deductions, as volume growth of 4% was offset by 5% lower net selling price. Enbrel® (etanercept) sales decreased 10% year-over-year to $510 million in the first quarter, driven by 47% lower net selling price resulting from increased 340B Program mix and higher commercial discounts, partially offset by 19% favorable changes to estimated sales deductions, higher inventory levels and volume growth. The year-over-year impact on net selling price is expected to be less pronounced in future quarters. AMJEVITA® (adalimumab-atto)/AMGEVITA™ (adalimumab) sales decreased 19% year-over-year to $136 million in the first quarter, primarily driven by 33% lower net selling price, partially offset by 11% volume growth. WEZLANA™ (ustekinumab-auub)/WEZENLA™ (ustekinumab) generated $150 million of sales in the first quarter. WEZLANA launched in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2025 and is the first FDA-approved biosimilar for the treatment of adult and pediatric plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. PAVBLU® (aflibercept-ayyh) generated $99 million of sales in the first quarter. PAVBLU launched in the U.S. in the fourth quarter of 2024 and is the first available aflibercept biosimilar for the treatment of retinal conditions, including neovascular age-related macular degeneration, macular edema following retinal vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema and diabetic retinopathy. Oncology BLINCYTO® (blinatumomab) sales increased 52% year-over-year to $370 million in the first quarter, primarily driven by volume growth. Vectibix® (panitumumab) sales increased 8% year-over-year to $267 million in the first quarter, driven by volume growth. KYPROLIS® (carfilzomib) sales decreased 14% year-over-year to $324 million in the first quarter, driven by lower volumes due to increased competition. LUMAKRAS®/LUMYKRAS™ (sotorasib) sales increased 4% year-over-year to $85 million in the first quarter, driven by volume growth, partially offset by lower net selling price. XGEVA® (denosumab) sales increased 1% year-over-year to $566 million in the first quarter. For 2025, we expect sales erosion driven by biosimilar competition, particularly in the second half of the year. Nplate® (romiplostim) sales decreased 1% year-over-year to $313 million in the first quarter as volume growth was more than offset by unfavorable changes to estimated sales deductions and foreign exchange impact. IMDELLTRA® (tarlatamab-dlle)/IMDYLLTRA™ (tarlatamab) generated $81 million of sales in the first quarter. Sales increased 21% quarter-over-quarter driven by volume growth. MVASI® (bevacizumab-awwb) sales decreased 11% year-over-year to $179 million in the first quarter, primarily driven by lower volume. Going forward, we expect continued sales erosion driven by competition. Established Products Our established products, which consist of Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa), Parsabiv® (etelcalcetide) and Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim), generated $557 million of sales in the first quarter. Sales decreased 3% year-over-year for the first quarter, driven by 10% lower net selling price and 3% unfavorable foreign exchange impact, partially offset by favorable changes to estimated sales deductions. Product Sales Detail by Product and Geographic Region Operating Expense, Operating Margin and Tax Rate Analysis On a GAAP basis: Total Operating Expenses increased 8% year-over-year for the first quarter. Cost of Sales as a percentage of product sales decreased 7.3 percentage points driven by lower amortization expense from the fair value step-up of inventory acquired from Horizon and lower manufacturing costs, partially offset by changes in our sales mix. Research & Development (R&D) expenses increased 11% driven by higher spend in later-stage clinical programs, partially offset by lower spend in marketed product support and research and early pipeline. Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased 7% driven by lower commercial product-related expenses and lower Horizon acquisition-related expenses, partially offset by higher general and administrative expenses. Other operating expenses consisted primarily of the Otezla® intangible asset impairment charge of $800 million. Operating Margin as a percentage of product sales increased 1.1 percentage points in the first quarter to 15.0%. Tax Rate increased 78.5 percentage points in the first quarter due to the change in earnings mix as a result of the first quarter 2025 unrealized gains compared to the first quarter 2024 unrealized losses on our equity investments, primarily BeiGene. On a non-GAAP basis: Total Operating Expenses increased 4% year-over-year for the first quarter. Cost of Sales as a percentage of product sales decreased 0.8 percentage points driven by lower manufacturing costs, partially offset by changes in our sales mix. R&D expenses increased 12% driven by higher spend in later-stage clinical programs, partially offset by lower spend in marketed product support and research and early pipeline. SG&A expenses decreased 3% driven by lower commercial product-related expenses, partially offset by higher general and administrative expenses. Operating Margin as a percentage of product sales increased 2.5 percentage points in the first quarter to 45.7%. Tax Rate decreased 0.8 percentage points in the first quarter due to the change in earnings mix and net favorable items as compared to the prior year. Cash Flow and Balance Sheet The Company generated $1.0 billion of free cash flow in the first quarter of 2025 versus $0.5 billion in the first quarter of 2024. This increase reflects an $800 million tax deposit made in the first quarter of 2024 and current quarter business performance, partially offset by timing of working capital items and higher capital expenditures. The Company declared a first quarter 2025 dividend on December 10, 2024 of $2.38 that was paid on March 7, 2025 to all stockholders of record as of February 14, 2025, representing a 6% increase from the same period in 2024. During the first quarter of 2025, the Company reduced principal debt outstanding by $2.8 billion. During the first quarter, there were no repurchases of shares of common stock. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $8.8 billion and debt outstanding totaled $57.4 billion as of March 31, 2025. 2025 Guidance For the full year 2025, the Company expects: Total revenues in the range of $34.3 billion to $35.7 billion. On a GAAP basis, EPS in the range of $12.21 to $13.46, and a tax rate in the range of 11.0% to 12.5%. On a non-GAAP basis, EPS in the range of $20.00 to $21.20, and a tax rate in the range of 14.5% to 16.0%. Capital expenditures to be approximately $2.3 billion. Share repurchases not to exceed $500 million. This guidance includes the estimated impact of implemented tariffs, but does not account for any tariffs that could be implemented in the future, including potential sector-specific tariffs. First Quarter Product and Pipeline Update The Company provided the following updates on selected product and pipeline programs: General Medicine MariTide (maridebart cafraglutide, AMG 133) MariTide is a differentiated peptide-antibody conjugate that activates the glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor and antagonizes the gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor (GIPR). MARITIME-1, a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of maridebart cafraglutide is enrolling adults living with overweight or obesity, without Type 2 diabetes mellitus. MARITIME-2, a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of maridebart cafraglutide is enrolling adults living with overweight or obesity, with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Planning for additional MARITIME Phase 3 studies across multiple indications remains on track, with additional studies expected to initiate throughout 2025. Part 2 of the Phase 2 chronic weight management study is ongoing in adults living with overweight or obesity, with or without Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Data readout is anticipated in H2 2025. A Phase 2 study investigating MariTide for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus has completed enrollment of adults living with and without obesity. Data readout is anticipated in H2 2025. AMG 513 A Phase 1 study of AMG 513 is enrolling people living with obesity following removal of the clinical hold by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Repatha VESALIUS-CV, a Phase 3 CV outcomes study of Repatha, is ongoing in patients at high CV risk without prior myocardial infarction or stroke. Data readout is event driven and anticipated in H2 2025. EVOLVE-MI, a Phase 4 study of Repatha administered within 10 days of an acute myocardial infarction to reduce the risk of CV events, is ongoing. Olpasiran (AMG 890) Olpasiran is a potentially best-in-class small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) molecule that reduces lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) synthesis in the liver. The OCEAN(a)-outcomes trial, a Phase 3 secondary prevention cardiovascular (CV) outcomes study, is ongoing in patients with atherosclerotic CV disease and elevated Lp(a). A Phase 3 CV outcomes study in patients with elevated Lp(a) and at high risk for a first CV event is expected to be initiated in H2 2025/H1 2026. Rare Disease TAVNEOS A Phase 3, open-label study of TAVNEOS in combination with rituximab or a cyclophosphamide-containing regimen, is enrolling patients from 6 years to < 18 years of age with active ANCA-associated vasculitis (Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA)/Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA)). TEPEZZA Regulatory review is underway in multiple additional geographies, including with the European Medicines Agency (EMA), where approval is anticipated in H2 2025. A Phase 3 study of TEPEZZA in Japan is enrolling patients with chronic/low clinical activity score thyroid eye disease (TED). A Phase 3 study evaluating the subcutaneous route of administration of teprotumumab is enrolling patients with TED. UPLIZNA In April, the FDA approved UPLIZNA for the treatment of Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD) in adult patients. In April, data from the UPLIZNA Phase 3 MINT study in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) were presented and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine. These data demonstrated durable and sustained efficacy of UPLIZNA treatment compared to placebo (adjusted difference, -1.8 at week 26; −2.8 at week 52) as measured by the change in baseline of Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score in the acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive (AChR+) subpopulation through week 52. Among the AChR+ patients in the UPLIZNA group, 72% had a ≥3 point improvement in the MG-ADL score, compared to 45% in placebo at week 52. No new safety signals were identified. The FDA has accepted the regulatory submission of the MINT Phase 3 data with a PDUFA date of December 14, 2025. Dazodalibep Dazodalibep is a fusion protein that inhibits CD40L. Two Phase 3 studies of dazodalibep in Sjögren's disease are enrolling patients. The first study is in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic disease activity, and the second study is in patients with moderate-to-severe symptomatic burden and low systemic disease activity. Daxdilimab Daxdilimab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting immunoglobulin-like transcript 7 (ILT7). A Phase 2 study of daxdilimab is ongoing in patients with moderate-to-severe active primary discoid lupus erythematosus refractory to standard of care. A Phase 2 study of daxdilimab is ongoing in patients with dermatomyositis and antisynthetase inflammatory myositis. Inflammation TEZSPIRE Two Phase 3 studies of TEZSPIRE were initiated and are enrolling adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a BEC ≥ 150 cells/µl. In March, data from the Phase 3 WAYPOINT study of TEZSPIRE in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) were presented and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine demonstrating that treatment with TEZSPIRE: significantly reduced Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) by -2.065 at week 52. significantly reduced nasal congestion (measured by participant-reported Nasal Congestion Score [NCS]) by -1.028 at week 52. Improvements in NPS were observed as early as week four, and NCS as early as week two, and were sustained through week 52. significantly reduced the need for nasal polyp surgery by 98%. significantly reduced the need for systemic corticosteroid treatment by 88%. had a safety profile consistent with its approved severe asthma indication. The FDA has accepted the regulatory submission of the WAYPOINT Phase 3 data with a PDUFA date of October 19, 2025. A Phase 3 study of TEZSPIRE is enrolling patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Rocatinlimab (AMG 451/KHK4083) Rocatinlimab is a first-in-class T-cell rebalancing monoclonal antibody that inhibits and reduces OX40-positive pathogenic T-cells. The eight study ROCKET Phase 3 program evaluating rocatinlimab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has enrolled over 3,300 patients. Enrollment is now complete in seven studies. In March, detailed data were presented from the ROCKET HORIZON Phase 3 study, which met its co-primary and all key secondary endpoints. In March, data were announced from three additional ROCKET program Phase 3 studies: The IGNITE study, which evaluated two dose strengths of rocatinlimab, met its co-primary endpoints and all key secondary endpoints at week 24: 42.3% of patients in the higher dose group achieved ≥75% reduction from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index score (EASI-75), a 29.5% difference vs. placebo. In the lower dose group, 36.3% of patients achieved EASI-75, a 23.4% difference vs. placebo. 23.6% of patients in the higher dose group achieved a validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with a ≥2-point reduction from baseline (vIGA-AD 0/1), a 14.9% difference vs. placebo. In the lower dose group, 19.1% of patients achieved this endpoint, a 10.3% difference vs. placebo. 22.7% of patients in the higher dose group achieved a revised Investigator's Global Assessment (rIGA™) score of 0/1 with a ≥2-point reduction from baseline (a more stringent measure of efficacy than vIGA-AD 0/1), a 14.4% difference vs. placebo. In the lower dose group, 16.3% of patients achieved this endpoint, an 8.0% difference vs. placebo. The SHUTTLE study, which evaluated two dose strengths of rocatinlimab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), met its co-primary endpoints and all key secondary endpoints at week 24. The VOYAGER study, which successfully demonstrated that rocatinlimab does not interfere with responses to tetanus and meningococcal vaccinations. Across ROCKET program results to date, safety findings were generally consistent with the previously observed safety profile of rocatinlimab. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (≥5%) with higher observed proportion in rocatinlimab groups were pyrexia, chills and headache. A higher number of patients receiving rocatinlimab vs. placebo experienced gastrointestinal ulceration events, with an overall incidence of less than 1%. Key upcoming milestones from the ROCKET Phase 3 program: ROCKET ASCEND is a study evaluating rocatinlimab maintenance therapy in adult and adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Data readout is anticipated in H2 2025. ROCKET ASTRO is a 52-week study evaluating rocatinlimab in adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Data readout is anticipated in H2 2025. A Phase 2 study of rocatinlimab is enrolling patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. A Phase 3 study of rocatinlimab is enrolling patients with prurigo nodularis (PN). Blinatumomab Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE ®) molecule targeting CD19. A Phase 2 study of blinatumomab in autoimmune disease was initiated in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Inebilizumab Inebilizumab is a B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody targeting CD19. A Phase 2 study of inebilizumab in autoimmune disease was initiated in adults with SLE. AMG 104 (AZD8630) AMG 104 is an inhaled anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) fragment antigen-binding (Fab). A Phase 2 study is enrolling patients with asthma. Oncology BLINCYTO / blinatumomab In April, the FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for subcutaneous blinatumomab in the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory CD19-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). A Phase 1/2 study of subcutaneous blinatumomab is ongoing in the dose-expansion and optimization phase in adult patients with relapsed or refractory Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-ALL. The Company is planning to advance blinatumomab subcutaneous administration to a potentially registration-enabling Phase 2 portion of this study with initiation in H2 2025. Golden Gate, a Phase 3 study of BLINCYTO alternating with low-intensity chemotherapy, is enrolling older adult patients with newly diagnosed Ph-negative B-ALL. IMDELLTRA / tarlatamab IMDELLTRA is the first and only FDA-approved delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) targeting BiTE® molecule. In April, the Company announced that the global Phase 3 DeLLphi-304 study met its primary endpoint of improved overall survival at a planned interim analysis. This study evaluated IMDELLTRA compared to local standard-of-care chemotherapy as a treatment for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who progressed on or after a single line of platinum-based chemotherapy. The safety profile for IMDELLTRA was consistent with its known profile. Together these randomized data have the potential to establish IMDELLTRA as a new standard of care in second-line SCLC. Detailed data from DeLLphi-304 will be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting (ASCO) in June. The Company is advancing a comprehensive, global clinical development program across extensive-stage and limited-stage SCLC: DeLLphi-303, a Phase 1b study of IMDELLTRA in combination with a programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, carboplatin and etoposide or separately in combination with PD-L1 alone, is ongoing in patients with first-line ES-SCLC. DeLLphi-305, a Phase 3 study of IMDELLTRA and durvalumab, is enrolling patients with first-line ES-SCLC in the maintenance setting. DeLLphi-306, a Phase 3 study of IMDELLTRA following concurrent chemoradiation therapy, is enrolling patients with limited-stage SCLC. DeLLphi-308, a Phase 1b study evaluating subcutaneous tarlatamab, is enrolling patients with second line or later ES-SCLC. DeLLphi-309, a Phase 2 study evaluating alternative intravenous dosing regimens in second-line ES-SCLC, is enrolling patients. DeLLphi-310, a Phase 1b study, was initiated in patients with ES-SCLC evaluating IMDELLTRA in combination with YL201, a B7-H3 targeting antibody-drug conjugate, with or without anti-PD-L1. DeLLphi-312, a Phase 3 study of first-line IMDELLTRA with carboplatin, etoposide and durvalumab is planned to initiate in patients with ES-SCLC by mid-2025. Xaluritamig (AMG 509) Xaluritamig is a first-in-class BiTE® targeting six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate 1 (STEAP1). A Phase 3 study of xaluritamig is enrolling patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have previously been treated with taxane-based chemotherapy. A Phase 1 study of xaluritamig monotherapy has completed enrollment of patients with mCRPC who have not yet received taxane-based chemotherapy and has also completed enrollment of patients with mCPRC who have previously received taxane-based chemotherapy in a fully outpatient treatment setting to further improve administration convenience. This study continues to enroll mCRPC patients into a combination treatment of xaluritamig and abiraterone. A Phase 1b study evaluating neoadjuvant xaluritamig therapy prior to radical prostatectomy is enrolling patients with newly diagnosed localized intermediate or high–risk prostate cancer. A Phase 1b study of xaluritamig is enrolling patients with high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after definitive therapy. AMG 193 AMG 193 is a first-in-class small molecule methylthioadenosine (MTA)-cooperative protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitor. A Phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of AMG 193 is enrolling patients with methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP)-null previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A Phase 1/1b/2 study of AMG 193 is enrolling patients with advanced MTAP-null solid tumors in the dose-expansion portion of the study. A Phase 1b study of AMG 193 alone or in combination with other therapies is enrolling patients with advanced MTAP-null thoracic malignancies. A Phase 1b study of AMG 193 in combination with other therapies is enrolling patients with advanced MTAP-null gastrointestinal, biliary tract and pancreatic cancers. A Phase 1/2 study of AMG 193 in combination with IDE397, an investigational methionine adenosyltransferase 2A (MAT2A) inhibitor, will be discontinued following a wind-down period. Bemarituzumab Bemarituzumab is a first-in-class fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b) targeting monoclonal antibody. FORTITUDE-101, a Phase 3 study of bemarituzumab plus chemotherapy, is ongoing in patients with first-line gastric cancer. Data readout is anticipated in Q2 2025. FORTITUDE-102, a Phase 1b/3 study of bemarituzumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab, is ongoing in patients with first-line gastric cancer. Phase 3 data readout is anticipated in H2 2025. FORTITUDE-103, a Phase 1b/2 study of bemarituzumab plus oral chemotherapy regimens with or without nivolumab, is enrolling patients with first-line gastric cancer. FORTITUDE-301, a Phase 1b/2 basket study of bemarituzumab monotherapy, is ongoing in patients with solid tumors with FGFR2b overexpression. LUMAKRAS/LUMYKRAS CodeBreaK 301, a Phase 3 study of LUMAKRAS in combination with Vectibix and FOLFIRI, is enrolling patients with first-line KRAS G12C–mutated CRC. CodeBreaK 202 (CB202), a Phase 3 study of LUMAKRAS plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, is enrolling patients with first-line KRAS G12C–mutated and PD-L1 negative advanced NSCLC. Nplate The final analysis of a Phase 3 study of Nplate as supportive care in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in gastrointestinal malignancies is complete. Data from this study will be presented at ASCO in June. Biosimilars A randomized, double-blind pharmacokinetic similarity study of ABP 206 compared with OPDIVO® (nivolumab) has completed enrollment of patients with resected stage III or stage IV melanoma in the adjuvant setting. Data readout is anticipated in H2 2025. A randomized, double-blind comparative clinical study of ABP 206 compared with OPDIVO is enrolling patients with treatment-naïve unresectable or metastatic melanoma. A randomized, double-blind pharmacokinetic similarity study of ABP 234 compared with KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) is enrolling patients with early-stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer as adjuvant treatment. A randomized, double-blind combined pharmacokinetic/comparative clinical study of ABP 234 compared to KEYTRUDA is enrolling patients with advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. A randomized, double-blind pharmacokinetic similarity/comparative clinical study of ABP 692 compared to OCREVUS® (ocrelizumab) was initiated and is currently enrolling patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. TEZSPIRE is being developed in collaboration with AstraZeneca. AMG 104 is being developed in collaboration with AstraZeneca. Rocatinlimab, formerly AMG 451/KHK4083, is being developed in collaboration with Kyowa Kirin. Xaluritamig, formerly AMG 509, is being developed pursuant to a research collaboration with Xencor, Inc. IDE397 is an investigational MAT2A inhibitor from IDEAYA Biosciences. YL201 is an investigational B7-H3 targeting antibody-drug conjugate being developed by MediLink. OPDIVO is a registered trademark of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. KEYTRUDA is a registered trademark of Merck & Co., Inc. OCREVUS is a registered trademark of Genentech, Inc. Non-GAAP Financial Measures In this news release, management has presented its operating results for the first quarters of 2025 and 2024, in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and on a non-GAAP basis. In addition, management has presented its full year 2025 EPS and tax guidance in accordance with GAAP and on a non-GAAP basis. These non-GAAP financial measures are computed by excluding certain items related to acquisitions, divestitures, restructuring and certain other items from the related GAAP financial measures. Management has presented Free Cash Flow (FCF), which is a non-GAAP financial measure, for the first quarters of 2025 and 2024. FCF is computed by subtracting capital expenditures from operating cash flow, each as determined in accordance with GAAP. The Company believes that its presentation of non-GAAP financial measures provides useful supplementary information to and facilitates additional analysis by investors. The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures to enhance an investor's overall understanding of the financial performance and prospects for the future of the Company's normal and recurring business activities by facilitating comparisons of results of normal and recurring business operations among current, past and future periods. The Company believes that FCF provides a further measure of the Company's liquidity. The Company uses the non-GAAP financial measures set forth in the news release in connection with its own budgeting and financial planning internally to evaluate the performance of the business, including to allocate resources and to evaluate results relative to incentive compensation targets. The non-GAAP financial measures are in addition to, not a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. About Amgen Amgen discovers, develops, manufactures and delivers innovative medicines to help millions of patients in their fight against some of the world's toughest diseases. More than 40 years ago, Amgen helped to establish the biotechnology industry and remains on the cutting-edge of innovation, using technology and human genetic data to push beyond what's known today. Amgen is advancing a broad and deep pipeline that builds on its existing portfolio of medicines to treat cancer, heart disease, osteoporosis, inflammatory diseases and rare diseases. In 2024, Amgen was named one of the "World's Most Innovative Companies" by Fast Company and one of "America's Best Large Employers" by Forbes, among other external recognitions. Amgen is one of the 30 companies that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average®, and it is also part of the Nasdaq-100 Index®, which includes the largest and most innovative non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization. For more information, visit Amgen.com and follow us on X (formerly known as Twitter), LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube and Threads. Forward-Looking Statements This news release contains forward-looking statements that are based on the current expectations and beliefs of Amgen. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including any statements on the outcome, benefits and synergies of collaborations, or potential collaborations, with any other company (including BeiGene, Ltd. or Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.), the performance of Otezla® (apremilast), our acquisitions of ChemoCentryx, Inc. or Horizon Therapeutics plc (including the prospective performance and outlook of Horizon's business, performance and opportunities, and any potential strategic benefits, synergies or opportunities expected as a result of such acquisition), as well as estimates of revenues, operating margins, capital expenditures, cash, other financial metrics, expected legal, arbitration, political, regulatory or clinical results or practices, customer and prescriber patterns or practices, reimbursement activities and outcomes, effects of pandemics or other widespread health problems on our business, outcomes, progress, and other such estimates and results. Forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below and more fully described in the Securities and Exchange Commission reports filed by Amgen, including our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and any subsequent periodic reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. Unless otherwise noted, Amgen is providing this information as of the date of this news release and does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in this document as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and actual results may differ materially from those we project. Our results may be affected by our ability to successfully market both new and existing products domestically and internationally, clinical and regulatory developments involving current and future products, sales growth of recently launched products, competition from other products including biosimilars, difficulties or delays in manufacturing our products and global economic conditions, including those resulting from geopolitical relations and government actions. In addition, sales of our products are affected by pricing pressure, political and public scrutiny and reimbursement policies imposed by third-party payers, including governments, private insurance plans and managed care providers and may be affected by regulatory, clinical and guideline developments and domestic and international trends toward managed care and healthcare cost containment. Furthermore, our research, testing, pricing, marketing and other operations are subject to extensive regulation by domestic and foreign government regulatory authorities. We or others could identify safety, side effects or manufacturing problems with our products, including our devices, after they are on the market. Our business may be impacted by government investigations, litigation and product liability claims. In addition, our business may be impacted by the adoption of new tax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities. Further, while we routinely obtain patents for our products and technology, the protection offered by our patents and patent applications may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by our competitors, or we may fail to prevail in present and future intellectual property litigation. We perform a substantial amount of our commercial manufacturing activities at a few key facilities, including in Puerto Rico, and also depend on third parties for a portion of our manufacturing activities, and limits on supply may constrain sales of certain of our current products and product candidate development. An outbreak of disease or similar public health threat, and the public and governmental effort to mitigate against the spread of such disease, could have a significant adverse effect on the supply of materials for our manufacturing activities, the distribution of our products, the commercialization of our product candidates, and our clinical trial operations, and any such events may have a material adverse effect on our product development, product sales, business and results of operations. We rely on collaborations with third parties for the development of some of our product candidates and for the commercialization and sales of some of our commercial products. In addition, we compete with other companies with respect to many of our marketed products as well as for the discovery and development of new products. Discovery or identification of new product candidates or development of new indications for existing products cannot be guaranteed and movement from concept to product is uncertain; consequently, there can be no guarantee that any particular product candidate or development of a new indication for an existing product will be successful and become a commercial product. Further, some raw materials, medical devices and component parts for our products are supplied by sole third-party suppliers. Certain of our distributors, customers and payers have substantial purchasing leverage in their dealings with us. The discovery of significant problems with a product similar to one of our products that implicate an entire class of products could have a material adverse effect on sales of the affected products and on our business and results of operations. Our efforts to collaborate with or acquire other companies, products or technology, and to integrate the operations of companies or to support the products or technology we have acquired, may not be successful. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to realize any of the strategic benefits, synergies or opportunities arising from the Horizon acquisition, and such benefits, synergies or opportunities may take longer to realize than expected. We may not be able to successfully integrate Horizon, and such integration may take longer, be more difficult or cost more than expected. A breakdown, cyberattack or information security breach of our information technology systems could compromise the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our systems and our data. Our stock price is volatile and may be affected by a number of events. Our business and operations may be negatively affected by the failure, or perceived failure, of achieving our sustainability objectives. The effects of global climate change and related natural disasters could negatively affect our business and operations. Global economic conditions may magnify certain risks that affect our business. Our business performance could affect or limit the ability of our Board of Directors to declare a dividend or our ability to pay a dividend or repurchase our common stock. We may not be able to access the capital and credit markets on terms that are favorable to us, or at all. CONTACT: Amgen, Thousand Oaks Elissa Snook, 609-251-1407 (media) Justin Claeys, 805-313-9775 (investors) Our GAAP diluted EPS guidance does not include the effect of GAAP adjustments triggered by events that may occur subsequent to this press release such as acquisitions, asset impairments, litigation, changes in fair value of our contingent consideration obligations and changes in fair value of our equity investments. The stated guidance also includes the estimated impact of implemented tariffs, but does not account for any tariffs that could be implemented in the future, including potential sector-specific tariffs. SOURCE Amgen WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM? 440k+ Newsrooms & Influencers 9k+ Digital Media Outlets 270k+ Journalists Opted In GET STARTED

这篇文章于2022年发表在ImmuneNetw.，主要总结了自身免疫性疾病靶向免疫治疗最新进展。摘要：     在过去的几十年里，靶向炎性细胞因子、免疫细胞和细胞内激酶的生物药物和小分子抑制剂已成为治疗自身免疫性疾病的标准护理。抑制TNF、IL-6、IL-17和IL-23彻底改变了类风湿性关节炎、强直性脊柱炎和银屑病等自身免疫性疾病的治疗。使用抗CD20mAb的B细胞耗竭疗法在神经炎症性疾病患者中显示出有希望的结果，抑制B细胞存活因子被批准用于治疗系统性红斑狼疮。靶向Ag呈递细胞和T细胞上表达的共刺激分子也有望通过调节T细胞功能在自身免疫性疾病中具有治疗潜力。     最近，靶向JAK家族（负责多个受体信号转导）的小分子激酶抑制剂在自身免疫和血液疾病领域引起了极大的兴趣。然而，在治疗效果和安全性方面仍存在未满足的医疗需求。新兴疗法旨在使用先进的分子工程技术在不影响免疫功能的情况下诱导免疫耐受。【NO.1】背景介绍     自身免疫性疾病是以自身抗原炎症失调为特征的病理性疾病，影响3%-10%的普通人群。自身免疫性疾病的常规治疗方法抑制了一般免疫功能以调节不受控制的炎症。然而，这些治疗方法在异质性患者群体中并未完全成功，其疗效以牺牲副作用为代价，特别是感染风险增加，通常来自非选择性免疫抑制。为了克服传统疗法的局限性，目前的治疗方法旨在更选择性地抑制炎症信号，同时最大限度地减少对稳态免疫功能的破坏。      最近在了解疾病发病机制和新药制造技术方面取得的进展导致靶向免疫疗法广泛用于治疗自身免疫性疾病。此外，先进的分子工程技术催生了靶向可溶性介质或细胞表面标志物的重组蛋白治疗药物，如mAb和receptor-Ab融合蛋白。自1990年代首次批准靶向TNF的选择性蛋白质疗法用于类风湿性关节炎（RA）以来，靶向免疫疗法已成为治疗自身免疫性疾病的游戏规则改变者。根据全球药品市场报告，阿达木单抗多年来一直是全球最畅销的药物，其次是其他靶向免疫疗法，如pembrolizumab、ibrutinib和ustekinumab。      随着对疾病发病机制的了解迅速增加，许多靶向炎症信号通路的生物药物正在开发中，以治疗顽固性炎症性疾病。在成功引入生物疗法治疗自身免疫性疾病后，分子靶点已扩展到细胞内激酶。小分子激酶抑制剂阻断收敛信号在治疗效果和长期安全性方面具有重要意义。    本文总结了目前针对自身免疫性疾病发病机制中涉及的信号通路的治疗方法，并介绍了旨在诱导免疫耐受的新兴免疫疗法。由于靶向免疫疗法市场正在迅速增长，因此我们专注于已获得临床批准用于治疗自身免疫性疾病的药物。【NO.2】自身免疫性疾病中的炎症     炎症是生物体修复组织损伤并防止外来物质侵害的自然过程。然而，针对自身抗原的免疫反应失调会导致免疫耐受丧失和自身免疫性疾病的发展。自身免疫源于耐受性检查点的中枢和外周缺陷以及不耐受免疫细胞的激活。自身抗原可通过从免疫特权位点释放自身抗原、产生新自身抗原以及自身蛋白与外来物质的分子模拟来诱导。     自身免疫的临床表现多种多样，从存在自身抗体的无症状疾病到导致危及生命的器官损伤的暴发性自身免疫性疾病。自身免疫性疾病的发展可由遗传易感个体的环境因素触发。环境触发因素，包括压力、吸烟和感染，会诱导先天免疫的促炎功能，并促进适应性免疫的病理反应。     尽管自身免疫的传统概念是适应性免疫系统的失调，但越来越多的证据表明，先天免疫系统对自身免疫性疾病的发生和发展也至关重要。作为先天免疫的关键参与者，巨噬细胞和树突状细胞（DC）对于抗原呈递和促炎细胞因子（如TNF、IL-1β、IL-6、IL-23、B细胞激活因子（BAFF，也称为Blys或TNFSF13B）和增殖诱导配体（APRIL，也称为TNFSF13A）的产生至关重要。1型IFN与系统性红斑狼疮（SLE）及其相关疾病的发病机制密切相关，主要由浆细胞样DC（pDC）产生，浆细胞样DC是DC的一个特殊亚群。巨噬细胞/DC和T细胞/B细胞之间的相互作用进一步促进了自身免疫性炎症。     初始CD4+Th细胞根据细胞因子环境分化为不同的T细胞亚群。T细胞通过自身抗原识别、细胞因子产生和增强的细胞毒性，在自身免疫性疾病的发病机制中发挥关键作用。近几十年来，产生IL-17和FOXP3+Tregs的Th17细胞已被强调为自身免疫性疾病的治疗靶点。     自身反应性B细胞是适应性免疫的另一个主要组分，它产生病理性自身抗体，并通过Ag呈递和细胞因子产生激活T细胞。自身抗体的产生是各种自身免疫性疾病（包括RA和SLE）的标志。RA中的抗瓜氨酸肽抗体和SLE中的抗dsDNA抗体是导致临床表现和疾病活动度的代表性致病性自身抗体。由于B细胞在自身免疫中的重要作用，B细胞表面分子是各种自身免疫性疾病的治疗靶点。     来自活化免疫细胞的可溶性介质通过与它们的同源受体结合来转导炎症信号。一旦被炎性细胞因子结合，受体就会激活JAK家族，以诱导STAT的磷酸化、二聚化和核转位。STAT的基因转录促进细胞增殖和分化以及多种炎症介质的产生，进一步加剧自身免疫性炎症。      尽管每种自身免疫性疾病的病理生理机制不同，但几种常见的炎症途径可能是免疫治疗的治疗靶点。基于我们目前对自身免疫性炎症发病机制的理解，治疗自身免疫性疾病的关键治疗靶点如图1所示。表1、2、3列出了已批准用于自身免疫性疾病或正在临床开发的靶向免疫疗法，具体如下。本文重点介绍靶向免疫治疗在免疫介导的炎症性疾病领域的临床应用。图1.自身免疫性疾病发病机制中的关键治疗靶点表1.用于治疗自身免疫性疾病的细胞因子靶向疗法靶细胞因子结构药物临床应用正在调查中（IIb或III期）TNF-ɑsTNFR2-IgG1Fc依那西普RA、pJIA、AS、银屑病、PsA抗TNF单克隆抗体英夫利昔单抗RA、AS、银屑病、PsA、UC、CD超说明书使用：BD、结节病阿达木单抗RA、pJIA、AS、银屑病、PsA、UC、CD、化脓性毛突炎、葡萄膜炎超说明书使用：BD戈利木单抗RA、AS、PsA、UC赛妥珠单抗RA、AS、银屑病、PsA、CDIL-1IL-1R拮抗剂阿那白滞素RA、大写字母川崎病（NCT04656184)超说明书使用：AOSD、sJIA、痛风、复发性心包炎等IL-1R1-IgGFc利洛西普CAPS、DIRA、复发性心包炎超说明书使用：AOSD、痛风等IL-1β抗体抗卡纳单抗AOSD、sJIA、CAPS、TRAPS、HIDS/MKD、FMFCOVID19相关CRS（12)超说明书使用：痛风和许多其他IL-6（英语）IL-6单克隆抗体抗体西鲁尤单抗RA（13,14)*奥洛珠单抗RA（15）（NCT02760407，NCT02760433，NCT03120949)克拉扎奇珠单抗RA（NCT02015520)PsA（16)COVID19相关CRS（NCT04343989)西妥昔单抗CAR-T相关CRS（NCT04975555)IL-6R抗体抗体托珠单抗RA、sJIA、pJIA、SSc相关ILD、巨细胞动脉炎、CRSPMR（NCT02908217)超说明书使用：AOSD、Takayasu动脉炎NMOSD（17)COVID19肺炎（18,19）（NCT04409262)沙利尤单抗RA类COVID19相关CRS（20）（NCT04315298)沃巴利珠单抗RA（NCT02518620)IL-17（英语）IL-17单克隆抗体抗体依奇珠单抗银屑病、PsA、轴向SpA苏金单抗AS、银屑病、PsA系统性红斑狼疮（NCT04181762)轴向SpA（21）（NCT04156620，NCT04732117)Hiradenitissupprativa（NCT03713619，NCT03713632，NCT04179175)巨细胞动脉炎（NCT04930094)Grave眼病（NCT03713619)IL-17R抗体溴达利尤单抗牛皮癣轴向SpA（22)PsA（23)不锈钢（NCT03957681)IL17A/F抗体比莫珠单抗AS（NCT03928743)轴向SpA（NCT03928704，NCT04436640)银屑病（24,25）（NCT03598790，NCT03766685)PsA（NCT03895203、NCT03896581、NCT04009499NCT04109976)Hiradenitissuppruativa（NCT04242446，NCT04242498，NCT04901195)IL-23抗p40mAb抗体乌司奴单抗银屑病、PsA、UC、CD特发性炎性肌炎（NCT03981744)高安动脉炎（NCT04882072)抗p19mAb抗体古塞利尤单抗银屑病，PsAUC（NCT04033445)CD（NCT03466411，NCT04397263)瑞沙珠单抗牛皮癣PsA（26,27)UC（NCT03398135，NCT03398148)CD（NCT03104413、NCT03105102、NCT03105128NCT04524611)替尔拉奇珠单抗牛皮癣PsA（NCT03552276、NCT04314544、NCT04314531NCT04991116)米利珠单抗银屑病（NCT03482011、NCT03535194NCT03556202)UC（NCT03518086、NCT03519945NCT03524092)CD（NCT03926130，NCT04232553)1型IFN抗IFNR1单克隆抗体Anifrolumab系统性红斑狼疮备注：该表包括具有一种或多种已批准自身免疫性疾病适应症的药物。该适应症仅涵盖自身免疫性疾病领域。pJIA，多关节幼年特发性关节炎;UC，溃疡性结肠炎;CD，克罗恩病;BD，白塞病;sJIA，系统性幼年特发性关节炎;DIRA，IL-1受体拮抗剂缺乏;TRAPS，TNF受体相关周期性综合征;HIDS/MKD、高免疫球蛋白D综合征/甲羟戊酸激酶缺乏症;FMF，家族性地中海热;CRS，细胞因子释放综合征;CAR-T，嵌合Ag受体-T细胞;SSc相关ILD、系统性硬化症相关间质性肺病、PMR、风湿性多肌痛、NMOSD、视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病;中轴型SpA，中轴型脊柱关节炎。*尽管III期临床试验取得了积极结果，但由于安全性问题，FDA并未推荐将sirukumab用于治疗RA。表2.用于治疗自身免疫性疾病的细胞靶向疗法靶细胞结构药物临床应用正在调查中（IIb或III期）B细胞抗CD20mAb抗体利妥昔单抗RA类寻常型天疱疮（28)GPA、MPA超说明书使用：MS、免疫性血小板减少症奥瑞珠单抗女士奥法木单抗女士乌布利妥昔单抗MS（NCT03277261、NCT03277248NCT04130997)抗CD19mAb抗体因比利珠单抗NMOSDIgG4RD（NCT04540497)重症肌无力（NCT04524273)抗BAFF单克隆抗体贝利尤单抗系统性红斑狼疮抗BAFF-R单克隆抗体伊那单抗系统性红斑狼疮（NCT05126277)pSS（29)T细胞CTLA4-IgG1Fc阿巴西普RA，pJIApSS（NCT02067910，NCT02915159)PsA（30)特发性炎性肌炎（NCT02971683)GPA（NCT02108860)CD40mAb抗体伊斯卡利单抗pSS（NCT03905525)备注：该表包括已批准用于自身免疫性疾病或基于II期试验的积极结果正在临床开发的药物。GPA，肉芽肿性多血管炎;MPA，显微镜下多血管炎;NMOSD，视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病;IgG4RD，免疫球蛋白G4相关疾病;pJIA，多关节幼年特发性关节炎。表3.用于治疗自身免疫性疾病的激酶靶向疗法靶标激酶结构药物临床应用正在调查中（IIb或III期）杰克JAK1/3抑制剂托法替布RA类贾（31）（NCT01500551，NCT03000439)PsAAS（32）)UC（英语）JAK1/2抑制剂巴瑞替尼RA类系统性红斑狼疮（NCT03843125，NCT03616912，NCT03616964)JIA（NCT03773965，NCT03773978)sJIA（NCT04088396)特应性皮炎（33,34)葡萄膜炎（NCT04088409)JAK1选择性抑制剂乌帕替尼RA类CD（NCT03345823、NCT03345836NCT03345849)PsA加州大学（35）（NCT03006068，NCT03653026)轴向SpA（NCT04169373)特应性皮炎（36,37）（NCT03661138，NCT04195698)高安动脉炎（NCT04161898)巨细胞动脉炎（NCT03725202)非戈替尼RA（由EMA和日本提供）统一（38）（NCT02914535)CD（NCT02914561，NCT02914600)TYKTYK2选择性抑制剂Deucravacitinib银屑病（NCT03624127，NCT03611751)PsA（NCT04908189，NCT04908202)BTK公司BTK抑制剂Evobrutinib（依布替尼）MS（NCT04338022，NCT04338061)托布替尼MS（NCT04410978、NCT04410991、NCT04411641NCT04458051)重症肌无力（NCT05132569)非布替尼MS（NCT04544449、NCT04586010NCT04586023)利扎布替尼寻常型天疱疮（NCT03762265)免疫性血小板减少症（NCT04562766)备注：该表包括已批准用于自身免疫性疾病或基于II期试验的积极结果正在临床开发的药物。UC，溃疡性结肠炎;sJIA，系统性幼年特发性关节炎;CD，克罗恩病;中轴型SpA，中轴型脊柱关节炎。【NO.3】细胞因子靶向治疗肿瘤坏死因子（TNF）     TNF是一种主要由髓系细胞和活化T细胞产生的促炎细胞因子。RA滑膜中TNF表达的增加和TNF转基因小鼠中关节炎的发展表明TNF在慢性炎症中的致病作用。抗TNF治疗的成功彻底改变了RA患者的治疗策略。自1998年英夫利昔单抗和依那西普首次获批以来，已有4种单克隆抗体（英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、戈利木单抗和赛妥珠单抗）和1种受体-Fc融合蛋白（依那西普）获批，目前可用于治疗慢性免疫介导的疾病，包括RA、幼年特发性关节炎（JIA）、强直性脊柱炎（AS）、银屑病和银屑病关节炎（PsA）。这种mAb也适用于治疗炎症性肠病和非感染性葡萄膜炎。      尽管TNF具有促炎作用，但它是一种多效性细胞因子，依赖于TNF受体（TNFR）的结合。TNFR1在几乎所有有核细胞上组成性表达，主要负责TNF的炎症功能，而TNFR2仅在特定细胞类型上表达，例如髓源性抑制细胞、Treg细胞和单核细胞，与TNF的调节功能相关。源自TNFR1和TNFR2的不同信号转导通路已在其他地方进行了综述。目前可用的抗TNF疗法同时抑制TNFR1和TNFR2。由于TNF的调节方面，TNF阻断可能反常地诱导Th1/Th17细胞扩增和IFN反应失调，这可以解释抗TNF治疗期间治疗失败、自身抗体生成和反常银屑病的原因。因此，正在研究抑制TNFR1和增强TNFR2的更多选择性治疗。IL-1     IL-1α和IL-1β是IL-1家族的成员，是促炎细胞因子，与先天免疫反应密切相关。尽管IL-1α和IL-1β通过与IL-1受体1（IL-1R1）结合而具有共享生物学功能，但IL-1α与IL-1β的几个特征是不同的。在间充质细胞中组成型表达的pro-IL-1α具有生物活性，而巨噬细胞产生的pro-IL-1β需要被caspase-1切割才能成为活性IL-1β。pro-IL-1β的Caspase-1依赖性裂解是通过激活包含核苷酸结合结构域成员和包含亮氨酸富集重复序列的[NLR]蛋白家族（例如NLR家族含pyrin结构域的[NLRP]1、NLRP3、NLR家族CARD结构域4）或包含PYRIN-HIN-200结构域的蛋白家族成员（例如，在黑色素瘤2中不存在）的炎性小体激活来介导的)。此外，与IL-1β相反，IL-1α在体循环中未检测到，这表明IL-1α在自身免疫性疾病中的致病作用是局部的，而不是全身的。目前，IL-1β被认为比IL-1α与多种风湿性疾病更密切相关，包括全身性JIA、成人发病斯蒂尔病（AOSD）和痛风，以及与遗传性自身炎症性疾病的相关性，例如冷热蛋白相关周期性综合征（CAPS）和家族性地中海热。     被IL-1α或IL-1β占据后，IL-1R1与IL-1R3形成异源三聚体复合体，以募集髓样分化初级反应基因88（MYD88），从而触发随后的激酶级联反应（IL-1R相关激酶[IRAK]、IκB激酶、IκB和NF-κB），从而促进促炎状态。IL-1的这种炎症活性受来自同一IL-1家族的天然IL-1R拮抗剂（IL-1Ra）的调节。IL-1Ra占据IL-1R1导致构象变化，阻碍异源三聚体复合物与IL-1R3的形成，从而阻碍IL-1介导的炎症过程。     目前，已有3种蛋白质疗法被批准用于抗IL-1疗法：canakinumab，一种抗IL-1βmAb;anakinra，一种重组IL-1受体拮抗剂;和rilonacept，一种IL-1R1-Fc融合蛋白。根据它们的分子结构，所有3种药物都阻断IL-1β，阿那白滞素和利洛西普也抑制IL-1α。作为一种抑制IL-1信号转导的新治疗方法，口服NLRP3抑制剂，包括达潘舒腈（OLT177），正在研究中。      在早期临床开发中，阿那白滞素被测试为RA的治疗方法。尽管阿那白滞素在RA患者中的治疗效果已得到证实，但由于其成本效益低，因此不推荐将阿那白滞素作为一线生物疗法。抗IL-1疗法更广泛地用于自身炎症性疾病，如全身性JIA、AOSD和CAPS。其他具有高炎症负荷的疾病，例如痛风和复发性心包炎，也可通过IL-1靶向治疗进行控制。由于IL-1在炎症性疾病中的广泛作用，IL-1阻断有望在治疗顽固性自身免疫性疾病（包括SLE和系统性硬化症）以及控制过度的促炎反应（如细胞因子释放综合征和巨噬细胞激活综合征）方面提供临床益处。IL-6     IL-6是一种多效性细胞因子，由各种细胞类型在感染、炎症和恶性肿瘤的情况下产生。IL-6最初被鉴定为T细胞分泌的“B细胞分化因子”或“B细胞刺激因子”。尽管抗IL-6疗法在B细胞成熟中起着关键作用，但其对多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗效果不佳。然而，托珠单抗（第一种抗IL-6R阻断单克隆抗体）的IL-6靶向治疗被证明在RA中具有显着的临床益处，甚至在疗效上优于阿达木单抗。托珠单抗目前被批准用于治疗RA、JIA、AOSD、巨细胞动脉炎和细胞因子释放综合征，因为它能够调节全身性过度炎症。最近，已研究抗IL-6疗法在SLE、视神经脊髓炎和系统性硬化症中的治疗应用。      IL-6在生理和病理条件下具有多种生物学功能。在生理状态下，IL-6负责巨噬细胞分化为M2状态，通过成骨细胞上RANK配体表达的增加进行破骨细胞生成，以及通过肝脏中的JAK-STAT通路进行急性期反应。在病理（炎症）条件下，IL-6通过调节FOXP3、RORC和IL-23R表达，关键参与Th17分化。IL-6对滤泡辅助性T细胞的发育和B细胞的成熟也很重要。      IL-6信号转导通过IL-6R和糖蛋白130（gp130）的复合物转导。gp130二聚化依次激活多个信号转导通路，包括JAK-STAT、MAPK、PI3K和YES相关蛋白1，这些蛋白转位到胞核并控制与细胞生长、增殖和炎症相关的基因转录。为了干扰IL-6信号通路，抗IL6疗法可以靶向IL-6、IL-6R、gp130、JAK和STAT3。然而，对副作用的担忧限制了gp130和STAT3作为治疗靶点的潜力。因此，抗IL6mAb、抗IL-6RmAb和JAK抑制剂已被用于阻断IL-6信号转导，并且使用可溶性gp130抑制IL-6/IL-6R复合体的可能性正在研究中。IL-17     IL-17A，通常称为IL-17，是CD4+T细胞Th17亚群的标志性细胞因子，但它也由CD8+T细胞（Tc17）、γδT细胞、自然杀伤T细胞、第3组先天性淋巴细胞和中性粒细胞产生。在生理状态下，Th17细胞通过募集中性粒细胞、宿主对细菌和真菌的防御以及皮肤和粘膜部位的组织修复来促进先天免疫。在病理条件下，IL-17A与TNF和其他炎性趋化因子协同作用，促进自身免疫。炎症性关节炎和神经炎症的动物模型表明，Th17细胞而不是Th1细胞在这些疾病的发展中起主要作用。     Th17细胞在IL-1β、IL-6和TGF-β存在下，通过抑制FOXP3并激活STAT3和RORC来源于初始CD4+初始T细胞。随后，IL-23稳定致病性Th17细胞的增殖和存活。与IL-17A结合后，IL-17R亚基A（IL-17RA）和亚基C（IL-17RC）的称为SEF/IL-17R的独特胞质结构域募集接头蛋白Act1，从而触发TNF受体相关因子（TRAF）6的泛素化，随后激活NF-κB、MAPK和激活蛋白1（AP1）通路和C/EBP转录因子。      来自动物和人类研究的越来越多的证据表明，IL-23/IL-17轴是多种自身免疫性疾病（如AS、PsA和RA）的极好治疗靶标。目前的抗IL-17疗法包括IL-17A（苏金单抗和依奇珠单抗）和IL-17RA（brodalumab）的mAb。正如预期的那样，抗IL-17疗法在银屑病、PsA和AS中产生了显著的反应。出乎意料的是，这种方法在RA（一种Th17依赖性疾病）患者中未能显示出显着的临床疗效。这种不令人满意的结果可以通过疾病本身的异质性或IL-17A的不同致病作用来解释，具体取决于RA分期（例如早期与晚期）。IL-23     IL-23是一种由DC和活化的巨噬细胞分泌的促炎细胞因子。作为IL-12家族的一员，IL-23是一种异二聚体，由IL-12共有的p40亚基（IL-12/IL-23p40）和IL-23特有的p19亚基（IL-23p19）组成。尽管IL-12和IL-23共享一个结构亚基，但IL-23更重要、更广泛地参与自身免疫性疾病的发病机制。最重要的是，IL-23通过维持Th17特征基因、抑制抑制因子、上调IL-23R表达和诱导效应基因来稳定Th17细胞的致病特征。它还作为自分泌因子促进DC和巨噬细胞的促炎功能。      IL-23与由IL-12Rβ1（与IL-12/IL-23p40结合）和IL-23R（与IL-23p19结合）组成的受体复合体相互作用，它们分别与酪氨酸激酶（TYK）2和JAK2结合。TYK2和JAK2的激活导致STAT的磷酸化和核转位，主要是STAT3。通过靶向抑制IL-12/IL-23p40或IL-23p19，可以阻断IL-23信号传导。作为一种抗IL-12/IL-23p40mAb，乌司奴单抗可阻断IL-12和IL-23，而抗IL-23p19mAb（guselkumab、tildrakizumab、risankizumab和mirikizumab）仅抑制IL-23。      与抗IL-17治疗类似，IL-23抑制可有效治疗银屑病和PsA。然而，与抗IL17治疗相比，靶向p40和p19亚基的mAb均未能改善AS的临床病程。尽管IL-23在AS的临床前模型中具有明显的致病作用，但这种意外结果表明，IL-23在人类自身免疫性疾病的组织和时间依赖性环境中发挥着不同的作用。在克罗恩病中，乌司奴单抗成功改善了临床结局，抗IL-23p19mAb的临床试验正在进行中（表1）。1型IFN     1型IFN，包括IFN-α、IFN-β、IFN-ε、IFN-κ和IFN-ω，最初被鉴定为可溶性抗病毒因子。随后的研究表明，IFN-α在自身免疫性疾病，尤其是SLE的发病机制中起着至关重要的作用。SLE患者的临床数据显示1型IFN特征的表达显著增加。重组IFN-α治疗后SLE样综合征的发展也表明1型IFN在自身免疫性疾病中的病理作用。      虽然大多数有核细胞可以产生1型IFN，但主要的细胞来源是pDC。含核酸的细胞外刺激，例如分别与抗RNA和DNA自身抗体复合的RNA和DNA，与pDC中的Toll样受体7（TLR7）和TLR9相互作用，以募集MYD88并激活IRAK和TRAF，从而导致IFN调节家族（IRF）7易位并导致IFN-α转录)。1型IFN与由IFNAR1和IFNAR2组成的IFN-α/β受体（IFNAR）结合。与1型IFN结合后，IFNAR1和IFNAR2分别激活JAK1和TYK2，从而导致STAT1和STAT2磷酸化和核转位。在胞核中，STAT1/STAT2与IRF9一起诱导IFN刺激基因的表达。在SLE中，IFN-α通过刺激髓系DC、Th1细胞和B细胞以及抑制Treg来促进促炎反应。     IFN-α在SLE中的病理生理学意义导致了1型IFN靶向免疫治疗的发展。在SLE中测试了Rontalizumab和sifalimumab中和干扰素α的单克隆抗体，但未能控制疾病活动。尽管IFN-α以外的IFN的作用尚不清楚，但仅抑制IFN-α而保持IFN-β和IFN-κ活性可能解释了SLE治疗效果不足的原因。最近，anifrolumab是一种靶向IFNAR1以阻断所有1型IFN生物学功能的人单克隆抗体，已被批准用于中度至重度SLE。Anifrolumab在减少疾病活动、口服皮质类固醇使用和年化发作方面显示出一致的临床益处。然而，狼疮性肾炎和神经精神性狼疮患者被排除在临床试验之外。     几种阻断1型IFN的新治疗方法正在研究中。为了减少1型IFN的产生，药物靶向pDC和信号转导分子，如TLR、MyD88和IRAK4。激酶抑制剂也正在临床开发中，用于治疗各种自身免疫性疾病，具体取决于它们抑制IFNAR下游信号通路的能力。【NO.4】细胞靶向治疗B细胞     随着我们对B细胞功能的理解不断扩大，B细胞被认为是自身免疫性疾病的积极参与者。有趣的是，B细胞耗竭疗法在RA和多发性硬化症（MS）中的成功突出了B细胞在自身免疫中的病理意义。除了在Ab产生中发挥作用外，B细胞还通过Ag呈递、三级淋巴组织的形成和细胞因子（如IL-6、TNF、IFN-γ和GM-CSF）的产生积极参与自身免疫。B细胞的Ab非依赖性功能解释了RA和MS中B细胞耗竭疗法的治疗效果，尽管没有自身抗体减少。     B细胞在骨髓中产生，并在外周组织中依次分化为Ag特异性B细胞。B细胞分化通过体细胞超突变和免疫球蛋白的类别转换重组，伴随着B细胞表面标志物的变化，继续增加对Ag的亲和力。CD20仅在从前B细胞到记忆B细胞的B细胞谱系中表达，但不在浆细胞中表达（图1）。在过去的几十年里，抗CD20疗法一直是B细胞耗竭的主要工具。利妥昔单抗是一种嵌合抗CD20mAb，可将CD20再分布到脂筏中，然后激活补体依赖性细胞毒性和Ab依赖性细胞毒性（ADCC）。利妥昔单抗有效消除CD20+B细胞会耗尽分泌Ab的浆母细胞的细胞来源，并阻止不依赖Ab的B细胞功能，从而减轻自身免疫性炎症。随着利妥昔单抗在RA和MS中的临床成功，已经开发了具有不同结合表位、不同给药途径和先进治疗效果的多种抗CD20疗法。Ocrelizumab和ofatumumab是人源化抗CD20mAb，已被批准用于复发性MS，其他抗CD20mAbobinutuzumab和ublituximab的临床试验正在进行中（表2）。      但是，利妥昔单抗在治疗SLE方面并未完全成功，SLE是刻板的B细胞介导的疾病之一。除了SLE患者的异质性外，利妥昔单抗治疗失败还可能由于存在自身反应性CD20−（但CD19+）长寿命浆细胞、外周血和组织中B细胞不完全耗竭或B细胞重建过程中的疾病发作。为了广泛抑制对抗CD20治疗耐药的B细胞，B细胞耗竭疗法靶向CD19，CD19在CD20+B细胞以及CD20-浆母细胞和一些浆细胞上表达。人源化抗CD19mAbinebilizumab被批准用于治疗视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病，并且正在进行临床试验以治疗其他炎症性神经系统疾病（表2）。     抑制B细胞的另一种方法是阻断B细胞存活因子，特别是BAFF和APRIL。BAFF与其3种不同受体连接后，与B细胞成熟和存活密切相关：1）BAFF受体（BAFF-R，称为TNFRSF13C），在除浆细胞外的大多数B细胞亚群上表达;2）跨膜激活剂、钙调节剂和亲环蛋白配体相互作用剂（TACI;称为TNFRSF13B），在边缘区B细胞、记忆B细胞和浆细胞上表达;3）B细胞成熟Ag（BCMA;称为TNFRSF17）在浆母细胞和浆细胞上表达。与BAFF-R不同，TACI和BCMA也与APRIL结合，这对Ab类别转换和浆细胞存活很重要。      鉴于B细胞成熟、增殖和存活的重要作用，BAFF/APRIL系统被认为是SLE及其相关自身免疫性疾病中一个有前途的治疗靶点。贝利尤单抗是一种人源化抗BAFFmAb，是FDA批准用于SLE的第一个靶向免疫疗法。然而，贝利尤单抗并不总是对所有SLE患者具有普遍的治疗益处。Ianalumab是一种抗BAFF-R的单克隆抗体，在原发性干燥综合征（pSS）患者的II期试验中显示出有希望的结果。作为B细胞耗竭疗法，ianalumab有2种作用模式：通过增强ADCC裂解B细胞和阻断BAFF信号传导。Telitacicept是一种TACI-Ig融合蛋白，基于其对BAFF/APRIL系统的抑制作用，也正在临床开发中。T细胞     作为适应性免疫的关键调节因子，T细胞在自身免疫的发生和发展中起着关键作用。T细胞效应器功能需要TCR的Ag识别和共刺激受体的额外参与。因此，已经研究了这些共刺激分子的调节用于自身免疫性疾病和恶性肿瘤的T细胞靶向治疗。       CD28信号转导是通过激活MAPK、AKT和NF-κB通路进行T细胞激活和分化的一种众所周知的共刺激通路。CD4+T细胞上表达的CD28与Ag呈递细胞上的CD80或CD86结合，CTLA-4作为CD28的抑制性对应物共享。基于CD28和CTLA-4的反调节，开发了一种由CTLA4胞外结构域和IgGFc区（CTLA4-Ig）组成的融合蛋白，通过占据CD80和CD86来抑制CD28信号传导。第一个CTLA4-Ig阿巴西普被批准用于治疗RA和JIA，已证实对控制炎症性关节炎有效。随后，另一种与CD80和CD86结合改善的CTLA4-Igs（包括belatacept和MEDI5256）已被研究用于临床应用。尽管贝拉西普于2011年被批准用于肾移植受者，但贝拉西普在基于钙调磷酸酶抑制剂的常规方案之外的额外临床益处存在争议。       CD40通路是T细胞效应器功能的主要激活信号。CD40L与CD40连接后，CD80和CD86表达上调。当活化T细胞上的CD40L与靶细胞上的CD40结合时，多个激酶级联反应会激活转录因子，如NF-κB和AP1，以诱导细胞存活、增殖和分化。CD40信号转导对于参与T细胞依赖性Ab反应、生发中心形成和记忆B细胞分化的B细胞-T细胞相互作用尤为重要。由于其在B细胞功能中的关键作用，靶向CD40信号转导的治疗潜力已在临床前和临床研究中得到研究。iscalimab（一种人源化抗CD40mAb）最近的II期试验显示pSS患者的临床改善，随后的III期试验正在进行中（表2）。       靶向其他共刺激信号转导的免疫疗法，如诱导型T细胞共刺激因子（ICOS）和OX40通路，也正在开发中，以抑制自身免疫性疾病中的T细胞效应功能。作为在活化的CD4+T细胞上表达的共刺激分子，ICOS和OX40参与T细胞的存活、分化和活化。【NO.5】激酶靶向治疗       如前所述，将可溶性炎症介质与其同源受体结合通过激活细胞内激酶（通常是JAK家族）来转导信号。JAK家族由JAK1、JAK2、JAK3和TYK2组成，与细胞因子受体（包括IL-2R、IL-4R、IL-5R、IL-6R、IL-13R和1型IFN）、生长激素和促红细胞生成素有关。JAK家族的激活导致STAT的磷酸化、二聚化和核转化。在细胞核中，STAT有助于参与细胞分化、增殖和存活、细胞因子产生和血管生成的基因转录。      由于JAK在造血中的关键作用，JAK抑制剂首次被评估用于治疗血液病，尤其是骨髓增生性肿瘤。自ruxolitinib（一种JAK1和JAK2抑制剂）于2011年首次被批准用于治疗骨髓纤维化以来，许多激酶抑制剂已被批准或研究用于治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤和炎症性疾病。几种JAK抑制剂已根据其经证实的临床疗效被批准用于RA、PsA和溃疡性结肠炎。每种JAK抑制剂对JAK的选择性不同，但尚未证明JAK抑制剂之间的治疗效果存在差异。Tofacitinib和baricitinib分别主要靶向JAK1/3和JAK1/2。Upadacitinib和filgotinib是第二代JAK抑制剂，可选择性抑制JAK1。      与上述调节细胞外间隙细胞激活信号的免疫疗法相比，JAK抑制剂靶向细胞内间隙的信号通路。JAK靶向治疗会抑制来自多个细胞因子受体的收敛信号，并破坏反馈回路。因此，即使部分阻断选定的激酶也可以有效地下调多种炎症信号通路，减轻自身免疫性炎症。应该注意的是，在一项头对头的随机对照试验中，巴瑞替尼显示出比抗TNFmAb阿达木单抗更好的临床反应。      除JAK抑制剂外，选择性TYK2抑制剂deucravacitinib正在等待临床批准，作为银屑病的首个口服靶向治疗。TYK2介导源自IL-12、IL-23和1型IFN的细胞内炎症信号。根据对PsA、炎症性肠病和SLE患者的机制见解，目前正在研究deucravacitinib在PsA、炎症性肠病和SLE患者中的治疗潜力（表3）。      布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶（BTK）抑制剂也有望通过调节B细胞功能来改善自身免疫性炎症。目前正在研究BTK抑制剂在各种自身免疫性疾病中的应用，包括RA、MS、pSS和SLE。最近一些使用BTK抑制剂的II期试验在复发性MS患者中显示出有希望的结果。      激酶抑制的未来方向是基于先进的分子技术开发更具选择性的抑制剂，具有最小的脱靶效应和更高的器官特异性。此外，应广泛研究由不受调节的细胞行为引起的除改善炎症以外的靶向效应。最近的证据表明，接受托法替布治疗的患者面临心脏事件、恶性肿瘤、血栓形成和死亡的风险增加，FDA已决定修改JAK抑制剂的黑框警告。自身免疫性疾病的慢性病程引发了对长期药物使用的安全性担忧，这会严重影响患者和医生的药物选择。【NO.6】新兴免疫疗法       随着对自身免疫性疾病免疫发病机制的更好理解和生物技术的不断进步，许多具有新治疗靶点和先进疗效的药物不断被开发出来，显示出有希望的疗效。尽管如此，仍然存在未满足的医疗需求，例如异质性治疗效果和免疫抑制引起的不良事件。为了克服当前治疗的局限性，炎症性疾病的治疗方法已经多样化和个体化。在这里，我们简要介绍了由先进分子工程技术实现的靶向免疫治疗的新视角。嵌合抗原受体（CAR）T细胞疗法      CART细胞疗法的基本概念是施用含有基因工程TCR的自体T细胞，以捕获肿瘤特异性Ag并通过增加细胞毒性来消除肿瘤细胞。在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者治疗成功后，CD19CART细胞疗法被批准用于治疗B细胞淋巴瘤和急性淋巴细胞白血病。    CAR是由胞外Ag识别结构域、跨膜结构域和胞内T细胞激活结构域组成的工程化受体。细胞外结构域，也称为单链Fv，被设计为单克隆抗体的可变重链和轻链。细胞外结构域对Ag的识别会激活细胞内结构域上基于免疫受体酪氨酸的激活基序，导致细胞因子的产生和靶细胞的裂解。为了提高治疗效果，细胞内结构域由一个激活结构域CD3ζ和一个共刺激结构域（如CD28）组成。     尽管CART细胞最初被引入肿瘤学领域，但它们消除病理细胞的治疗潜力延伸到自身免疫性炎症性疾病的治疗。最近，Mougiakakos等人报道了自体CD19CART细胞疗法在常规治疗难治性SLE患者中的快速临床缓解。在该患者中，单次给药后7周内可在外周血中检测到输注的CD19CART细胞，抗dsDNA抗体快速且持续下降。这是一个有希望的结果，因为目前抗CD20mAb的B细胞耗竭需要定期注射并注意免疫原性以维持初始治疗效果。     随着工程T细胞疗法的发展，嵌合自身抗原受体（CAAR）T细胞和CARTreg疗法作为自身免疫性疾病的新型治疗策略而受到关注。CAART细胞的胞外结构域表达一种自身抗原，该抗原可与Ag特异性自身反应性B细胞和T细胞相互作用。CAART细胞疗法可能对具有已知自身抗原的自身免疫性疾病有效。CARTreg细胞的设计也期望产生Ag特异性免疫调节反应，而输注多克隆Treg细胞无法充分实现这种反应。然而，这种针对自身免疫性疾病的工程化T细胞疗法尚未得到广泛研究。此外，尽管工程化T细胞疗法具有假设的治疗效果，但细胞因子释放综合征和神经毒性可能会限制对细胞疗法在自身免疫性疾病中使用的热情，尤其是在高炎症微环境中。低剂量IL-2疗法     IL-2是Treg细胞分化、激活和存活的关键细胞因子，主要由活化的CD4+T细胞产生。Treg定义为CD4+FOXP3+CD25+CD127低表达，通过分泌抗炎细胞因子（IL-10、肿瘤生长因子-β和IL-35）、DC诱导免疫抑制酶（吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶）、效应T细胞和NK细胞失活以及对CD8+T细胞和NK细胞的直接细胞毒性。Treg细胞缺陷和/或功能障碍常见于RA、SLE、pSS和AS等各种自身免疫性疾病。      除了激活Treg细胞外，IL-2还诱导效应T细胞的存活和增殖，并抑制Th17细胞分化。基于其对常规T细胞的刺激作用，大剂量IL-2疗法首次被批准用于转移性肾细胞癌和转移性黑色素瘤。然而，后来的研究表明，IL-2的主要作用是通过在Treg细胞上表达的高亲和力IL-2R介导的。IL-2R以单体、二聚体和三聚体变体表达，三聚体IL-2R的亲和力高于单体和二聚体形式。由于Treg细胞在高水平上组成性表达三聚体IL-2R，因此Treg细胞对IL-2比效应记忆CD4+T细胞高度敏感。因此，已在自身免疫性疾病中评估了低剂量IL-2疗法（0.3至300万国际单位/天），预计它将通过Treg刺激诱导免疫耐受，同时对效应T细胞的影响最小。      在自身免疫性疾病（包括SLE、PsA和丙型肝炎病毒诱导的冷球蛋白血症血管炎）患者中，低剂量IL-2疗法改善了临床结果，这与Treg细胞的增加一致。在临床试验中，低剂量IL-2具有可耐受的安全性，并且与感染风险增加无关。此外，在小鼠中，低剂量IL-2长期治疗不会损害对疫苗接种、感染和癌症的免疫反应。     良好的临床试验结果导致开发了氨基酸序列改变的工程化IL-2蛋白（IL-2突变蛋白），以提高选择性并减少不良反应。IL-2与生物疗法（如TNF和IL-6抑制）的组合也正在研究中。免疫耐受诱导      在不破坏免疫系统其他部分的情况下诱导对自身抗原的免疫耐受是治疗自身免疫性疾病的理想方法。在这方面，可以诱导Ag特异性免疫耐受的口服耐受性已经研究了一个多世纪。肠道相关淋巴组织（GALT）是最大的免疫器官，可维持对大量食物和共生微生物的耐受性。鉴于GALT在肠道稳态和全身调节中的作用，饲喂Ags对系统性自身免疫性疾病的耐受性影响已在临床前和临床试验中得到广泛研究。在动物模型中，发现口服耐受诱导可有效预防甚至治疗各种炎症性疾病，包括炎症性关节炎、实验性自身免疫性脑炎、糖尿病和葡萄膜炎。根据Ag的剂量，低剂量的Ag会促进分泌IL-4、IL-10和TGF-β的Treg细胞的产生，而高剂量的Ag会促进特定T细胞的克隆缺失或无反应。然而，这种免疫耐受机制并不排斥，可以重叠。      口服耐受诱导的早期试点试验和II期试验也显示出对RA、MS和葡萄膜炎患者有希望的结果，而没有治疗相关的毒性。然而，在RA和MS患者中进行Ag喂养的III期试验显示治疗效果不佳。尽管Ag喂养具有实验效果和可接受的安全性，但仍需要解决未解决的问题才能成功诱导免疫耐受：（1）Ag喂养方案（Ag的剂量和类型、粘膜佐剂的使用和给药频率）;（2）与常规免疫抑制药物联合治疗;（3）反映口服耐受性发展有效性的生物和免疫标志物;4）选择适合诱导口服耐受的患者（年龄、疾病发作和脱敏史）。      抗原特异性耐受性的另一种方法是递送自身抗原的耐耐受性疫苗。致耐受性疫苗已成功诱导Ag特异性Treg细胞，并在自身免疫性疾病的动物模型中促进自身反应性T细胞无反应和细胞凋亡。已经研究了几种耐受性原疫苗平台，包括基于蛋白质/肽、纳米颗粒、细胞和DNA/RNA的疫苗，以增强MS临床前和临床研究中的免疫原性。尽管使用肽疫苗的III期试验未能显示出临床益处，但仍在使用MS患者的多种疫苗平台对耐受性方法进行研究。      最近，Krienke等人报道了在髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白（MOG35-55）诱导的实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎小鼠模型中，使用基于非炎性mRNA的疫苗成功诱导免疫耐受。尽管双链RNA分子在细胞外环境中具有固有的促炎性，但用1-甲基假尿苷（m1Ψ）取代尿苷会降低其促炎性质。MOG35-55编码m1Ψ修饰的单链mRNA疫苗可预防小鼠疾病的发展和进展。致耐受性疫苗诱导MOG35-55特异性FOXP3+Treg细胞并抑制MOG33-35特异性Th1和Th17细胞。PD1和CTLA4等抑制分子在Ag特异性细胞上的表达上调，疫苗的保护作用被PD1和CTLA-4靶向检查点抑制剂消除。      尽管如此，耐受性疫苗的开发具有挑战性，因为哪些自身抗原对自身免疫性疾病具有特异性尚无定论且存在争议，并且多种自身抗原可能涉及大多数自身免疫性疾病。【NO.7】结论      过去几十年来靶向免疫治疗的进步彻底改变了自身免疫性疾病患者的治疗和临床结果。目前的靶向免疫疗法通过阻断炎性细胞因子、细胞表面分子和细胞内激酶来抑制主要的促炎信号通路。尽管靶向治疗在自身免疫性疾病中取得了巨大成功，但在药物疗效和长期安全性方面仍未满足医疗需求。除了阻断炎症信号通路外，未来的疗法还旨在诱导长期的免疫耐受，同时保持保护性免疫功能。希望生物技术的进步和疾病知识将为开发具有更高治疗效果和最小不良反应的新药提供机会。此外，考虑到炎症介质和免疫细胞的多方面作用，需要开发更具选择性和特异性的药物，同时更精确地了解疾病发病机制。识别微信二维码，添加抗体圈小编，符合条件者即可加入抗体圈微信群！请注明：姓名+研究方向！本公众号所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的，且明确注明来源和作者，不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系(cbplib@163.com)，我们将立即进行删除处理。所有文章仅代表作者观点，不代表本站立场。